"I know what to do with this post"

::Delated::

::Deltree::

::Beleted::

*gets angry*

::DELTROPED::

"GGGGAAAAAA"

*pours soda all over keyboard and it starts sparking*

Brought to you by :Dragisoni

I luvz nivez

...Well at least there's sex scenes in Anne Rice... If you have ever read a single book written by her you will realise she is indeed one horny old bat.

That being said I've only ever read one vampire book by Anne Rice, and it was far above the par of your standard vampire novel, though a bit fetish like.

For example... male vampires, according to that horny old bat, all have PERMENANT erections, who needs viagra when you can become a walking sperm bank.

However, here's the kicker, vampires (at least according to Anne Rice) can not orgasm.

Imagine walking around for the rest of your, immortal life, with a boner the size of a german sauage, and I don't mean a normal german sausage, I mean a big F**king slab of meat known as "Oma Huersen's BrautWurst" I swear, those sausages are the size of my bloody forearm.

To destroy a being whilst they are unrepentant is to preserve the being in body and spirit, so long as this remains true the people of the world shall always be free.

*cough cough*
well...this thread just got weird when I checked it

as for the vampire thing...while I do condemn him for not lurking...I believe, that while this sites primary function is to prepare for the undead apocalypse, we have a secondary obligation to be prepared for all forms of disaster, whether it be flood, vampires, or a horde of flying carnivorous tribbles...

Life is to be lived, not controlled, and humanity is won by continuing to play in face of certain defeat.
Ralph Ellison

Incorrect. Anne Rice's vamps lose the ability to make love in the traditional way, their equipment useless after death and re-birth. The only way they have sexual pleasure is when two vampires do a series of exchanges of blood, said in the books to surpass the physical pleasure of orgasm. (the hot tub rose petal scene from Queen of the Damned was the best visual of it)
Only exception I saw was in Tale of the Body Thief where Lestat trades bodies with a human male and has sex once. And he went back to being a vampire. Ha, must be that good, according to the Vampire Chronicles.

"When there is no more room in Hell, the dead shall walk the Earth"
-- Because The MUPPET SHOW Said So.
Back to top

IZ I, LEAZER GNOME!
MI AMIE IS TAKING O\/ER.
SIMON,NOW IS TYM 4 THE IN\/ASION!

im back and I brought an army..

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
00000000000000000000000

OMG......I never thought I would have to disagree with sanchez....

the 30 days of night vampires were not anything like Bram Stoker's Dracula. In the movie they were being stupid and jumping through windows and all kinds of ridiculous things. Did you forget that it takes a great deal of intelligence and cleverness to being a vampire? Vampires have to be invited wherever they wish to roam. Hence why in the book Dracula brought Harker to his estate in Transylvania and ends up tricking him into saying that he is welcome to England and his home at any time, which gives him the right to roam all of England as much as he pleases (but not everyones homes).

Im one of the die hard fans of the TRUE horror stories, not the adaptaion that Hollywood makes you see. I find it insulting that this thread is on this site because if a vampire drinks the blood of a minion or another undead such as a zombie (thats not a vampire) it will simply die. No hybrid, sorry. I however am not sure about the Vampire biting a Werewolf idea. I haven't found anything from the origins of the myths that would give me a clue, so "Underworld" may have the right idea, but I still doubt it.

"Jesus God Almighty look at that bunch over there man! They've spotted us!!"

1. I never said they were alike.
2. Just because the vampires in 30DN didn't have the superstitious nonsense that comes with traditional vampires does not make them inferior. Being bloody brutal killing machines instead of [edited due to content] is a excellent change in the vampire genre.
3. I'm not like the legions of Romero moonbats who scream bloody murder just because the guys from DOTD04 decided to do their own thing by breaking away from the not scary shambling sack of fertillizer. So I'm not going to have any problem with someone stepping away from the traditional myth.

So.... Without anymore to say.... You fail....

Ross Kemp can suck my sweaty hairy balls.

There are many ways to say that things are alike without using the exact wording.....even calling 30 days of night "vampires" vampires, is an insult to the genuine article.

DISCLAIMER:
THIS IS ALL MY OPINION AND IN THAT SENSE, MAY BE WRONG IN YOUR OPINION.

Which is scarier to you?
a bloodthirsty creature with an average joe IQ chasing after you?

Or...

A genius that has to feast on blood. He is used to hunting and has done it for centuries, hes gotten so good at it he can even invite you to his home without you knowing what he truly is and manipulate you into letting him have access to yourself and your loved ones without you even realizing you've done it. After its too late and you try to defend yourself, he will toy with you, frighten you, confuse you, and play a sort of mental chess game in which you think you'll be winning by choosing the safest action (in your mind) but in truth, you'll be falling deeper into his plan. In my opinion its this one and by taking away the intelligence of the creature in question, you make him far less intimidating and dangerous and therefore far more inferior.

There is a large difference between stepping away from the genre and making something your own. I have not yet seen anything close to stepping away from the genre other than Anne Rice, and I still dont even completely agree to what shes done to vampires. Everything from the stupid Twilight adaptation to even the enjoyable Underworld adaptation, is making it their own. They took the idea of something named a vampire that has to feed on blood to survive and tried to make their own creature from it. Usually they follow the same guidelines such as cant survive in sunlight and such, but leaving out a vital peice such as they must be invited in is just as important as saying that now zombies can fly. That happened to be one of the very few things that humans could use as ammunition against vampires.

Zombies aren't a very picky creature because there are many different ways to think of where the zombie originated and what form of zombie you are thinking of (from the walking dead to the infected). Some folklores from certain areas give evidence that rabies may have been the start of some zombie stories, while others can believe that it may be the walking dead as George A. Romero crafted.

I dont care though really, seeing as im talking about Vampires here and not zombies.

And I never aimed this whole thing directly at you sanchez in the aspect of whether you "failed" or "passed", I was simply putting up my point in the spirit that I disagreed with you. In THAT aspect of your misunderstanding id say that YOU failed. Sorry : /

"Jesus God Almighty look at that bunch over there man! They've spotted us!!"

lazergnome takes your kidney^.^
lezrgnome want kno if ncropedofilia exst among zoombie chidwen.
it wong have buttphuck w/ zoombies?

im back and I brought an army..

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
00000000000000000000000

Everyone... We must stop squabling and get back to yelling at whoever thought of zombie vampires...

On that note, I feel like watching a marathon of Romero, 28 and some good old 30DN, maybe even some Nochoi Dozor.

To destroy a being whilst they are unrepentant is to preserve the being in body and spirit, so long as this remains true the people of the world shall always be free.